Second Thought: Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Son of Garp

Are we playing God ó or Frankenstein?


On Oct. 4, 1992, an 18-year-old dental assistant named Marion Ploch was driving to work near the German city of Erlangen. She lost control of her car and crashed into a tree. Local doctors spent four days trying to save her, but her fractured skull was too damaged.
While trying to revive Ploch, doctors discovered that she was 14 weeks pregnant. The fetus was not harmed in the wreck, and, though Ploch was declared brain-dead on Oct. 8, the doctors and Plochís parents decided to keep her body alive with machines to see if the baby could develop enough in its motherís body to survive outside the womb. Five weeks later, however, Marion Plochís brain-dead body miscarried.
Fast forward 10 years. Israeli soldier Keivan Cohen was killed by a Palestinian sniper in 2002. He was single and left no will. At his parentsí request, a sperm sample was taken from his body and stored. When Cohenís family attempted to use the sperm for in vitro fertilization, the hospital refused access, and the Cohens filed suit.
Flip forward five more years. Austinite Kathleen Smith and her husband, U.S. Army Lt. Brian D. Smith, have a beautiful 15-month-old boy named Benton. Heís the spitting image of his father who, sadly enough, has never met the boy. Brian was killed by a sniper in Habbaniya, Iraq, on July 2, 2004. When Benton was born, Brian had been dead for two years.
Kathleen and Brian had been trying in vitro fertilization, and they agreed that she should continue the procedure after Brian left for Iraq. Kathleen was about to start a new fertilization attempt when she learned of her husbandís death.
Brianís parents initially opposed Kathleen continuing the process because they worried about her raising the child on her own and were disturbed by the fact that Brian had no say in the matter. Kathleenís determination eventually won them over.
Back in Israel, Keivan Cohenís parents won their lawsuit. They are now planning to hire a complete stranger as an incubator, to produce a baby using the five-year-old sperm taken from their sonís corpse to ďrebirthĒ some facsimile of Keivan.
Texas widow Kathleen Smith and the parents of Marion Ploch and Keivan Cohen all lost their loved ones and simply wanted to save some part of those theyíd lost. But just as itís understandable, itís also disturbing.
Whatís Kathleen Smith going to tell Benton when he gets older? His ďpostmortemĒ conception introduces a strange addendum to the traditional ďbirds and beesĒ narrative. Boy does meet girl, boy and girl fall in love and get married, but boy dies before girl gets pregnant, and Mr. Stork shows up more than a year after Bentonís arrival would have been naturally possible. In Keivanís case, boy will never even have met girl. And if Plochís baby had survived, girl would have met boy, boy would have gotten girl pregnant, girl would have died, and dead girl would have given birth to baby.
Am I the only one whoís creeped out by this?
Thinking about how you were conceived is always uncomfortable, even when itís natural. But when you introduce refrigeration processes, test tubes, inseminating syringes, court battles, and unnatural procreation, isnít that getting morbid? And arenít we lifting the lid of Pandoraís box just a little?
Donít get me wrong. Iíve always had contempt for the folks who stand around at funerals and talk about death as ďGodís will.Ē I think thatís a crock, and obviously folks like the Plochs, the Cohens, and Kathleen Smith agree.
But when does all of this become ill-conceived Prometheanism?
The aims of these families were not ignoble, but neither were those of Dr. Victor Frankenstein. I am not suggesting in vitro fertilization or even postmortem conception is inherently monstrous, but somewhere the mad doc has to be smiling. And the lives resulting from such practices may experience a painful ďothernessĒ that most of us would never wish on the ones we loved.
There are practical implications, too ó will Benton be eligible for his fatherís military death benefits? Should some limits be set on how long some guyís sperm can be kept on ice before itís thawed out to create an instant, no fuss-no muss descendant? Or on who can be impregnated with it?
The Cohensí lawyer, Irit Rosenblum, has called postmortem conception a ďhuman revolution.Ē Isnít it more than that? Wonít it permit do-overs, re-runs, after-the facts, and Boys from Brazil-type stuff, tempting humans to reach for immortality in all the wrong ways?
And back to young Benton: Will he enjoy being the poster child for postmortem conception? Iím afraid heís going to have a much tougher time of it than Garp.
E. R. Bills is a local freelance writer.

Email this Article...

Back to Top

Copyright 2002 to 2018 FW Weekly.
3311 Hamilton Ave. Fort Worth, TX 76107
Phone: (817) 321-9700 - Fax: (817) 335-9575 - Email Contact
Archive System by PrimeSite Web Solutions